{ "d" : { 
  "results": [ 
    { "__metadata": { "uri": "nodeID://b662809743" }, 
      "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type": { "__deferred": { "uri": "http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Axiom" } }, 
      "http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#describedby": { "__deferred": { "uri": "http://localhost:8890/about/id/entity/http/purl.obolibrary.org/obo/iao.owl" } }, 
      "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment": "requested by Melanie Courtot", 
      "http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#annotatedSource": { "__deferred": { "uri": "http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000147" } }, 
      "http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#annotatedProperty": { "__deferred": { "uri": "http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000116" } }, 
      "http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#describedby": { "__deferred": { "uri": "https://covidontheweb.inria.fr:4443/about/id/entity/http/purl.obolibrary.org/obo/iao.owl" } }, 
      "http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#annotatedTarget": "zero dimension continuant fiat boundaries are not spatial points. Considering the example 'the quadripoint where the boundaries of Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, and Arizona meet' : There are many frames in which that point is zooming through many points in space. Whereas, no matter what the frame, the quadripoint is always in the same relation to the boundaries of Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, and Arizona.", 
      "http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0010000": { "__deferred": { "uri": "http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/bfo/axiom/0000001" } }, 
      "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#seeAlso": { "__deferred": { "uri": "https://groups.google.com/d/msg/bfo-owl-devel/s9Uug5QmAws/ZDRnpiIi_TUJ" } }
     } 
 ], "__count": "1"
 } }