Description
Metadata
Settings
About:
Should non-experts defer to epidemiologists with regard to the response to the coronavirus pandemic? We argue that deference is required with regard to settled science: non-experts (that is, people who may possess expertise of their own but whose expertise is not relevant to a particular question) ought to defer with regard to climate science and the efficacy of vaccines. However, we suggest that this deference is warranted because these questions have been appropriately probed many times by many different kinds of people. While non-experts should defer to epidemiologists with regard to matters within the sphere of epidemiology specifically, responding to the pandemic requires expertise from many fields. We best build a consensus worth deferring to by contributing our expertise now. Ethicists and philosophers are not epistemically arrogant if they question policy responses. Rather, they play a responsible role in building a reliable consensus.
Permalink
an Entity references as follows:
Subject of Sentences In Document
Object of Sentences In Document
Explicit Coreferences
Implicit Coreferences
Graph IRI
Count
http://ns.inria.fr/covid19/graph/entityfishing
5
http://ns.inria.fr/covid19/graph/articles
3
Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91
Alternative Linked Data Documents:
Sponger
|
ODE
Raw Data in:
CXML
|
CSV
| RDF (
N-Triples
N3/Turtle
JSON
XML
) | OData (
Atom
JSON
) | Microdata (
JSON
HTML
) |
JSON-LD
About
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License
.
OpenLink Virtuoso
version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software