About: Mental Distress in Dermatologists During COVID‐19 Pandemic: Assessment and Risk Factors in A Global, Cross‐Sectional Study

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Mental Distress in Dermatologists During COVID‐19 Pandemic: Assessment and Risk Factors in A Global, Cross‐Sectional Study Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : covidontheweb.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
title	Mental Distress in Dermatologists During COVID‐19 Pandemic: Assessment and Risk Factors in A Global, Cross‐Sectional Study
Creator	Author, Bhargava, Shashank Kroumpouzos, George Sarkar, Rashmi Kroumpou-Zos, George
source	Medline; PMC
abstract	BACKGROUND: There is a sparsity of data regarding the mental health status of dermatologists during COVID‐19 pandemic. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the effects of pandemic on mental health of dermatologists on a large scale and identify risk factors for mental distress. METHODS: 733 dermatologists were included in this cross‐sectional, web‐based survey. RESULTS: Mental distress was reported by 77.2% of responders. Considerable percentages of participants experienced stress (73.9%), irritation (33.7%), insomnia (30%), or depression (27.6%), and 78.6% were overwhelmed with the amount of pandemic information they were receiving. Mental distress was significantly associated with practice years, volume of patients seen per week before pandemic, personal protective equipment availability at hospital (P=.001 for each), practice location (continent) (P <.001), and participant's assessment that the healthcare system was not equipped for the pandemic (P=.003). Stress was associated with hospital service (P=.003), and depression with being overwhelmed with the amount of pandemic information received (P=.004). In a logistic model, teledermatology use was the most powerful predictor of mental distress (OR, 1.57 [95% CI, 1.07‐2.32]). CONCLUSIONS: Mental distress was common among dermatologists during this pandemic. Teledermatology use was the most powerful predictor of mental distress. Preventative strategies and psychosocial interventions should be implemented. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
has issue date	2020-08-08(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1111/dth.14161
bibo:pmid	32770716
has license	no-cc
sha1sum (hex)	d5b0039e616e619dd49013f8d0e22422c5692987
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.14161
resource representing a document's title	Mental Distress in Dermatologists During COVID‐19 Pandemic: Assessment and Risk Factors in A Global, Cross‐Sectional Study
has PubMed Central identifier	PMC7435490
has PubMed identifier	32770716
schema:publication	Dermatol Ther
resource representing a document's body	covid:d5b0039e616e619dd49013f8d0e22422c5692987#body_text
is schema:about of	named entity 'COVID-19' named entity 'pandemic' named entity 'dermatologists' named entity 'mental health' named entity 'sparsity' named entity 'mental health' named entity 'emotional distress' named entity 'healthcare systems' named entity 'burnout' named entity 'information received' named entity 'PPE' named entity 'Mental distress' named entity 'suicide' named entity 'psychological distress' named entity 'dermatologists' named entity 'dermatologists' named entity 'dermatologists' named entity 'odds ratio' named entity 'depression' named entity 'crisis management' named entity 'burnout' named entity 'Healthcare providers' named entity 'anxiety' named entity 'statistically significant' named entity 'odds ratio' named entity 'burnout' named entity 'urban area' named entity 'mental distress' named entity 'mental distress' named entity 'mental distress' named entity 'Asia' named entity 'depression' named entity 'dermatology' named entity 'anxiety' named entity 'clinically meaningful' named entity 'dependent variable' named entity 'social distancing' named entity 'dermatologists' named entity 'insomnia' named entity 'logistic regression' named entity 'demographic factors' named entity 'depression' named entity 'dermatologists' named entity 'North America' named entity 'risk factors' named entity 'Asia' named entity 'clinical depression' named entity 'information received' named entity 'anxiety' named entity 'post-traumatic stress disorder' named entity 'PPE' named entity 'logistic model' named entity 'mental health' named entity 'insomnia' named entity 'surgical specialties' named entity 'depression' named entity 'risk factor' named entity 'literature review' named entity 'Medscape' named entity 'depression' named entity 'stress levels' named entity 'morbidity' named entity 'emotional distress' named entity 'China' named entity 'Depression' named entity 'COVID-19' named entity 'virus' named entity 'odds ratio' named entity 'PPE' named entity 'population density' named entity 'risk factors' named entity 'mental health' named entity 'physician burnout' named entity 'COVID-19' named entity 'post-traumatic stress disorder' named entity 'statistical analysis' named entity 'clinically meaningful'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software