About: N95 filtering facepiece respirators do not reliably afford respiratory protection during chest compression: A simulation study

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: N95 filtering facepiece respirators do not reliably afford respiratory protection during chest compression: A simulation study Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : covidontheweb.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
has title	N95 filtering facepiece respirators do not reliably afford respiratory protection during chest compression: A simulation study
Creator	Park, Hyun Yoon, Hee Kim, Seonwoo Kim, Taerim Lee, Guntak Yoon, Aerin Hwang, Sung Sim, Min Cha, Chul Jung, Yul Shin, Gun
Source	Elsevier; Medline; PMC
abstract	Abstract Background N95 filtering facepiece respirators (N95 respirators) may not provide adequate protection against respiratory infections during chest compression due to inappropriate fitting. Methods This was a single-center simulation study performed from December 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016. Each participant underwent quantitative fit test (QNFT) of N95 respirators according to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration protocol. Adequacy of respirator fit was represented by the fit factor (FF), which is calculated as the number of ambient particles divided by the number inside the respirator. We divided all participants into the group that passed the overall fit test but failed at least one individual exercise (partially passed group [PPG]) and the group that passed all exercises (all passed group [APG]). Then, the participants performed three sessions of continuous chest compressions, each with a duration of 2 min, while undergoing real-time fit testing. The primary outcome was any failure (FF < 100) of the fit test during the three bouts of chest compression. Results Forty-four participants passed the QNFT. Overall, 73% (n = 32) of the participants failed at least one of the three sessions of chest compression; the number of participants who failed was significantly higher in the PPG than in the APG (94% vs. 61%; p = 0.02). Approximately 18% (n = 8) of the participants experienced mask fit failures, such as strap slipping. Conclusions Even if the participants passed the QNFT, the N95 respirator did not provide adequate protection against respiratory infections during chest compression.
has issue date	2020-01-31(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1016/j.ajem.2019.03.041
bibo:pmid	30955924
has license	els-covid
sha1sum (hex)	d0a2dd89ebb2536193367582f80cbe142cbc4290
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.03.041
resource representing a document's title	N95 filtering facepiece respirators do not reliably afford respiratory protection during chest compression: A simulation study
has PubMed Central identifier	PMC7125572
has PubMed identifier	30955924
schema:publication	The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
resource representing a document's body	covid:d0a2dd89ebb2536193367582f80cbe142cbc4290#body_text
is schema:about of	named entity 'respirators' named entity 'N95' named entity 'chest compressions' named entity 'Each' named entity 'fit' named entity 'Methods' named entity 'testing' named entity 'reliably' named entity 'SIMULATION' named entity 'RESPIRATORY PROTECTION' named entity 'ACCORDING' named entity 'INDIVIDUAL' named entity 'RESPIRATORY INFECTIONS' named entity 'RESPIRATOR' named entity 'MASK' named entity 'QUANTITATIVE' named entity 'FAILED' named entity 'CONCLUSIONS' named entity 'ADEQUACY' named entity 'STUDY' named entity 'APG' named entity 'REAL-TIME' named entity 'PPG' named entity 'DID' named entity 'SLIPPING' named entity '100%' named entity 'INSIDE' named entity 'CALCULATED' named entity 'PARTICIPANTS' named entity 'TESTING' named entity 'RESPIRATORS' named entity 'CHEST COMPRESSION' named entity 'N95' named entity 'METHODS' named entity 'AMBIENT' named entity 'RESPIRATORS' named entity 'FIT' named entity 'DECEMBER' named entity 'FACTOR' named entity 'DO NOT' named entity 'STUDY' named entity 'N95' named entity 'PROTECTION' named entity 'HEALTH ADMINISTRATION' named entity 'FILTERING' named entity 'FITTING' named entity 'CONTINUOUS' named entity 'BUT' named entity 'STRAP' named entity 'BOUTS' named entity 'NUMBER' named entity 'PARTICIPANT' named entity 'PARTICLES' named entity 'FAILURE' named entity 'OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH' named entity 'DUE TO' named entity 'CHEST COMPRESSION' named entity 'EXERCISES' named entity 'EXERCISE' named entity 'SIMULATION' named entity 'NUMBER OF' named entity 'MIN' named entity 'PASSED' named entity 'SINGLE' named entity 'PROTOCOL' named entity 'APPROXIMATELY' named entity 'PROVIDE' named entity 'WAS A' named entity 'OVERALL' named entity 'DURATION' named entity '0.02'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software