About: Use of Obstetric Practice Web Sites to Distribute Zika Virus Information to Pregnant Women During a Zika Virus Outbreak

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Use of Obstetric Practice Web Sites to Distribute Zika Virus Information to Pregnant Women During a Zika Virus Outbreak Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : covidontheweb.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
title	Use of Obstetric Practice Web Sites to Distribute Zika Virus Information to Pregnant Women During a Zika Virus Outbreak
Creator	Kasturi, Raghuraj Maier, Emily Chadwell, Camero Chamberlain, Allison De Mondesert, Laura Delahoy, Miranda Ellingson, Mallory Forsberg, Katie Goryoka, Grace Khan, Aalisha King, Laura Ko, Jasmine Lehnert, Jonathan Mazzei, Amelia Nguyen, Catherine Pratt, Caroline Rao, Anirudh Roth, David Seagle, Emma Serio, Tara Vanmaldeghem, Kelley Varvoutis, Maria Vereen, Marissa
source	Medline; PMC
abstract	OBJECTIVE: To describe the current use of obstetric practice Web sites to disseminate Zika virus information to patients. DESIGN: Review of 913 randomly selected practice Web sites and associated social media accounts in January and August 2016. SETTING: Obstetric practice Web sites and associated social media accounts, United States of America. PARTICIPANTS: N/A. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of obstetric practice Web sites and linked social media accounts providing Zika virus information. RESULTS: Twenty-five percent and 35% of obstetric practice Web sites had information posted about Zika virus in January 2016 and August 2016, respectively. Between the 2 time points, the proportion of practices posting Zika virus content on Facebook and Twitter declined (Facebook: 15% in January, 9% in August; Twitter: 12% in January, 8% in August). In August, the most frequently observed Zika virus–related content themes were the use of insect repellent (14%) and travel advisories (14%). At both time points, practices affiliated with large university hospitals were more likely to have posted information on Zika virus than independent OB/GYN-only practices: January: odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) = 5.68 (3.50-9.20); August: OR (95% CI) = 8.37 (5.31-13.17). Similarly, practices associated with nonuniversity hospitals were more likely to have posted information than independent OB/GYN-only practices: January: OR (95% CI) = 2.71 (1.88-3.92); August: OR (95% CI) = 6.75 (4.75-9.60). CONCLUSION: Obstetric care practices are not fully utilizing their practice Web sites to relay Zika virus information to their patients. Since practitioner-sponsored Web sites have the capacity to directly reach the populations at greatest risk for Zika virus complications, public health professionals should consider adapting their materials and provider outreach campaigns to more easily accommodate Web site–based information dissemination during this type of public health emergency. There must be greater recognition of the value information gains in the eyes of the patient when it is validated by their own provider, especially when that patient is part of the highest-risk population for a given emergency. Public health organizations should strive to minimize the burden it takes for providers to relay useful resources to patients in order to maximize the impact that those resources can have.
has issue date	2017-09-29(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1097/phh.0000000000000537
bibo:pmid	28125540
has license	cc-by-nc-nd
sha1sum (hex)	b51603b65f40d384c4aa0f11379f0dcc387e46b1
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1097/phh.0000000000000537
resource representing a document's title	Use of Obstetric Practice Web Sites to Distribute Zika Virus Information to Pregnant Women During a Zika Virus Outbreak
has PubMed Central identifier	PMC5636051
has PubMed identifier	28125540
schema:publication	J Public Health Manag Pract
resource representing a document's body	covid:b51603b65f40d384c4aa0f11379f0dcc387e46b1#body_text
is schema:about of	named entity 'OUTBREAK' named entity 'SITES' named entity 'OBJECTIVE' named entity 'UNITED STATES OF AMERICA' named entity 'REVIEW OF' named entity 'INFORMATION' named entity 'OUTCOME MEASURES' named entity 'DESIGN' named entity 'WEB' named entity 'PATIENTS' named entity 'SETTING' named entity 'AUGUST' named entity 'PARTICIPANTS' named entity 'ASSOCIATED' named entity 'ZIKA VIRUS' named entity 'WEB' named entity 'TO DISTRIBUTE' named entity 'PRACTICE' named entity 'USE OF' named entity 'INFORMATION' named entity 'OBSTETRIC' named entity 'SITES' named entity 'PREGNANT WOMEN' named entity 'TO DESCRIBE' named entity 'OBSTETRIC' named entity 'PROVIDING' named entity 'SELECTED' named entity 'SOCIAL MEDIA' named entity '913' named entity 'DISSEMINATE' named entity 'USE OF' named entity 'JANUARY' named entity 'PROPORTION' named entity 'CURRENT' named entity 'MAIN' named entity 'PRACTICE' named entity 'ZIKA VIRUS' covid:arg/b51603b65f40d384c4aa0f11379f0dcc387e46b1 named entity 'virus' named entity 'virus' named entity 'Obstetric' named entity 'Zika' named entity 'data collection' named entity 'virus' named entity 'risk communication' named entity 'public health' named entity 'ACOG' named entity 'Health care providers' named entity 'Zika' named entity 'United States' named entity 'obstetrical' named entity 'Social media' named entity 'data collection' named entity 'data collection' named entity 'Zika' named entity 'Twitter' named entity 'data collection' named entity 'health information' named entity 'ACOG'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software