About: The use of automated sequential blood pressure in hypertension clinics compared with office and ambulatory blood pressure measurements

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: The use of automated sequential blood pressure in hypertension clinics compared with office and ambulatory blood pressure measurements Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : covidontheweb.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
has title	The use of automated sequential blood pressure in hypertension clinics compared with office and ambulatory blood pressure measurements
Creator	Baghdady, Yasser Mahmoud, Kareem Elaroussy, Ayah Elaroussy, Wafaa Eldeeb, Heba
Source	Medline; PMC
abstract	BACKGROUND: Office blood pressure (OBP) measurement is the most common method of blood pressure measurement. However, it is associated with several pitfalls as white coat effect and masked hypertension. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is usually used for diagnosis of hypertension and elimination of white coat effect. This study aimed to assess the correlation and degree of agreement of the automated sequential blood pressure (ASqBP) with OBP and ABPM. Patients presented to hypertension clinic were included. Each patient had his blood pressure recorded by three methods: OBP using a digital sphygmomanometer device, unattended ASqBP using sequential BP devices with recording of the readings over 30 min, and ABPM that was performed within 48 h of office visit using portable BP devices with BP recording over 24 h. RESULTS: We recruited 64 patients (age 50.0 ± 15.0 years and female gender 53.1%). We found a strong positive correlation between ASqBP and OBP readings (r 0.81 for SBP and 0.83 for DBP, p < 0.001). We also found a strong positive correlation between ASqBP and ABPM readings (r 0.74, p < 0.001). The ASqBP readings were lower than OBP (137.0 ± 16.8/86.4 ± 13.8 vs. 142.7 ± 15.5/88.5 ± 12.3) and close to ABPM readings (average 24 h, 134.0 ± 15.4/88.5 ± 12.3, and daytime, 135.8 ± 15.7/82.1 ± 13.7). For SBP readings, there was moderate agreement between ASqBP and AMBP (both average and daytime). For DBP readings, there was fair agreement between ASqBP and AMBP (both average and daytime). CONCLUSION: ASqBP measurement has good correlation with OBP and ABPM readings. Unattended automated office pressure has moderate degree of agreement with ABPM for the SBP& fair degree of agreement for the DBP. It can be used in the hypertension clinics to eliminate the problems of white coat effect and marked BP variability.
has issue date	2020-08-17(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1186/s43044-020-00087-9
bibo:pmid	32804322
has license	cc-by
sha1sum (hex)	aed7732e0c19d84c3160101b100dd1ea30632680
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1186/s43044-020-00087-9
resource representing a document's title	The use of automated sequential blood pressure in hypertension clinics compared with office and ambulatory blood pressure measurements
has PubMed Central identifier	PMC7430128
has PubMed identifier	32804322
schema:publication	Egypt Heart J
resource representing a document's body	covid:aed7732e0c19d84c3160101b100dd1ea30632680#body_text
is schema:about of	named entity 'Results' named entity 'Office' named entity 'devices' named entity 'readings' named entity 'devices' named entity 'Conclusion' named entity 'ambulatory blood pressure' named entity 'DEGREE' named entity 'DIAGNOSIS OF HYPERTENSION ' covid:arg/aed7732e0c19d84c3160101b100dd1ea30632680 named entity 'readings' named entity 'measurement' named entity 'eliminate' named entity 'average' named entity 'problems' named entity 'age' named entity 'degree' named entity 'white coat' named entity 'correlation' named entity 'recruited' named entity 'digital' named entity 'moderate' named entity 'marked' named entity 'However' named entity 'variability' named entity 'recorded' named entity 'compared' named entity 'hypertension' named entity 'hypertension' named entity 'ABPM' named entity 'degree of agreement' named entity 'Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring' named entity 'hypertension' named entity 'AMBP' named entity 'AMBP' named entity 'ABPM' named entity 'blood pressure' named entity 'Windows' named entity 'ABPM' named entity 'AMBP' named entity 'diastolic' named entity 'urine analysis' named entity 'SPSS' named entity 'dyslipidemia' named entity 'hypotensive' named entity 'diastolic' named entity 'blood pressure monitor' named entity 'blood sugar' named entity 'High Blood Pressure' named entity 'ACEI' named entity 'mmHg' named entity 'antihypertensive' named entity 'Canadian' named entity 'sphygmomanometer' named entity '26.1' named entity 'creatinine' named entity 'Blood pressure measurements' named entity 'ambulatory blood pressure monitoring' named entity 'Heart rate' named entity 'diastolic' named entity 'AMBP' named entity 'diastolic' named entity 'ABPM' named entity 'antihypertensive' named entity 'CKD' named entity 'Omron' named entity 'hypertension' named entity 'sphygmomanometer' named entity 'white-coat hypertension' named entity 'correlation' named entity 'hypertension' named entity 'Systolic blood pressure' named entity 'reproducibility' named entity 'anti-hypertensive' named entity 'correlation' named entity 'diastolic blood pressure' named entity 'BMI'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software