About: Comparing the Fit of N95, KN95, Surgical, and Cloth Face Masks and Assessing the Accuracy of Fit Checking

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Comparing the Fit of N95, KN95, Surgical, and Cloth Face Masks and Assessing the Accuracy of Fit Checking Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : covidontheweb.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
has title	Comparing the Fit of N95, KN95, Surgical, and Cloth Face Masks and Assessing the Accuracy of Fit Checking
Creator	Ward, James Clarkson, P O'kelly, Eugenia Pirog, Sophia
Source	MedRxiv
abstract	Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has made well-fitting face masks a critical piece of protective equipment for healthcare workers and civilians. While the importance of wearing face masks has been acknowledged, there remains a lack of understanding about the role of good fit in rendering protective equipment useful. In addition, supply chain constraints have caused some organizations to abandon traditional quantitative or qualitative fit testing, and instead, have implemented subjective fit checking. Our study seeks to quantitatively evaluate the level of fit offered by various types of masks, and most importantly, assess the accuracy of implementing fit checks by comparing fit check results to quantitative fit testing results. Methods: Seven participants first evaluated N95 and KN95 masks by performing a fit check. Participants then underwent quantitative fit testing wearing five N95 masks, a KN95 mask, a surgical mask, and fabric masks. Results: N95 masks offered higher degrees of protection than the other categories of masks tested; however, it should be noted that most N95 masks failed to fit the participants adequately. Fit check responses had poor correlation with quantitative fit scores. All non-N95 masks achieved low fit scores. Conclusion: Fit is critical to the level of protection offered by masks. For an N95 mask to provide the promised protection, it must fit the participant. Performing a fit check was an unreliable way of determining fit.
has issue date	2020-08-21(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1101/2020.08.17.20176735
has license	medrxiv
sha1sum (hex)	876342c4ad6e6d7e5860d88218804969883640f9
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.17.20176735
resource representing a document's title	Comparing the Fit of N95, KN95, Surgical, and Cloth Face Masks and Assessing the Accuracy of Fit Checking
resource representing a document's body	covid:876342c4ad6e6d7e5860d88218804969883640f9#body_text
is schema:about of	named entity 'quantitatively' named entity 'supply chain' named entity 'Masks' named entity 'N95' named entity 'ADDITION' covid:arg/876342c4ad6e6d7e5860d88218804969883640f9 named entity 'quantitative' named entity 'face masks' named entity 'face masks' named entity 'Fit' named entity 'fit testing' named entity 'protective equipment' named entity 'KN95' named entity 'N95' named entity 'peer review' named entity 'CC-BY 4.0 International license' named entity 'NHS' named entity '2.1' named entity 'surgical masks' named entity 'Respiratory protective equipment' named entity 'preprint' named entity 'KN95' named entity 'level of confidence' named entity 'N95' named entity 'preprint' named entity 'N95' named entity 'range of activities' named entity 'preprint' named entity 'copyright holder' named entity 'viral transmission' named entity 'fit testing' named entity 'COVID' named entity 'surgical masks' named entity 'Public Health England' named entity 'CC-BY 4.0 International license' named entity 'preprint' named entity 'medRxiv' named entity 'medRxiv' named entity 'United States' named entity 'path of least resistance' named entity 'N95' named entity 'PHE' named entity '18.2' named entity 'N95' named entity 'medRxiv' named entity 'KN95' named entity 'copyright holder' named entity 'COVID-19' named entity 'coronavirus' named entity 'CC-BY 4.0 International license' named entity 'medRxiv' named entity 'protective equipment' named entity 'M-29' named entity 'N95' named entity 'N95' named entity 'medRxiv' named entity 'surgical masks' named entity 'copyright holder' named entity 'KN95' named entity 'NIOSH' named entity 'Center for Disease Control' named entity 'N95' named entity 'N95' named entity 'preprint' named entity 'CC-BY 4.0 International license' named entity 'copyright holder' named entity 'rates of infection' named entity 'clinical practice' named entity 'preprint' named entity 'preprint' named entity 'preprint' named entity 'N95' named entity 'KN95' named entity 'fit testing' named entity 'medRxiv' named entity 'fit testing' named entity 'airborne particles' named entity 'preprint' named entity 'CC-BY 4.0 International license' named entity 'medRxiv' named entity 'KN95' named entity 'CC-BY 4.0 International license'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software