About: Comparison of three rapid influenza diagnostic tests with digital readout systems and one conventional rapid influenza diagnostic test

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Comparison of three rapid influenza diagnostic tests with digital readout systems and one conventional rapid influenza diagnostic test Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : covidontheweb.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
title	Comparison of three rapid influenza diagnostic tests with digital readout systems and one conventional rapid influenza diagnostic test
Creator	Kim, Juwon Kim, Hyon-Suk Lee, Jong-Han Uh, Young Lee, Suh, In Shin, Sung Yoon, Jun Correspondence, Jong-Han Kap, \| Kyu, \| Ryu, Se-Min Won, Sook
source	Medline; PMC
abstract	BACKGROUND: Rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs) show variable sensitivities in clinical settings. We aimed to compare three digital RIDTs and one conventional RIDT. METHODS: We assessed 218 nasopharyngeal swabs from patients between neonates and 90 years old in 2016. Three digital RIDTs were BUDDI, Sofia Influenza A+B Fluorescence Immunoassay, Veritor System Flu A+B assay. One conventional test was the SD Bioline Influenza Ag A/B/A(H1N1/2009). All test results were compared with those from the Anyplex Flu A/B Typing Real‐time Detection real‐time PCR. The four RIDTs were tested with diluted solutions from the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) to compare lower detection limit. Cross‐reactivity of four RIDTs within other respiratory viruses was identified. RESULTS: For influenza A, BUDDI, Sofia, Veritor, and Bioline showed 87.7%, 94.5%, 87.7%, and 72.6% sensitivity, and 100%, 97.7%, 96.5%, and 100% specificity. For influenza B, BUDDI, Sofia, Veritor, and Bioline showed 81.7%, 91.7%, 81.7%, and 78.3% sensitivity, and 100%, 95.3%, 100%, and 100% specificity, respectively. Each RIDT could detect diluted NIBSC solution, according to the level of dilution and specific influenza subtypes. Cross‐reactivity of four RIDTs with other respiratory viruses was not noted. CONCLUSIONS: Sofia showed the highest sensitivity for influenza A and B detection. BUDDI and Veritor showed higher detection sensitivity than a conventional RIDT for influenza A detection, but similar results for influenza B detection. Further study is needed to compare the test performance of RIDTs according to specific, prevalent influenza subtypes.
has issue date	2017-04-13(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1002/jcla.22234
bibo:pmid	28407318
has license	bronze-oa
sha1sum (hex)	7869d9bd96bbe92dff28bd42a77e92cd7d5a1e67
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.22234
resource representing a document's title	Comparison of three rapid influenza diagnostic tests with digital readout systems and one conventional rapid influenza diagnostic test
has PubMed Central identifier	PMC6817280
has PubMed identifier	28407318
schema:publication	Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
resource representing a document's body	covid:7869d9bd96bbe92dff28bd42a77e92cd7d5a1e67#body_text
is schema:about of	named entity 'influenza' named entity 'sensitivity' named entity 'compared' named entity 'test' named entity 'Comparison' named entity 'READOUT' named entity 'YEARS' named entity 'DETECTION LIMIT' named entity 'SYSTEM' named entity 'NOTED' named entity 'OLD' named entity 'STUDY' named entity 'TEST' named entity 'STANDARDS' named entity 'DIAGNOSTIC TESTS' named entity 'RAPID INFLUENZA DIAGNOSTIC TEST' named entity '2FB' named entity 'ASSESSED' named entity 'REAL-TIME' named entity 'SOLUTION' named entity 'LOWER' named entity 'SOLUTIONS' named entity 'DILUTED' named entity 'CONVENTIONAL' named entity 'Immunoassay' named entity 'swabs' named entity 'digital' named entity 'detection' named entity 'H1N1' named entity 'Biological' named entity 'System' named entity 'Sofia' named entity 'Cross-reactivity' named entity 'detection' named entity 'specificity' named entity 'Flu' named entity 'Immunoassay' named entity 'H1N1' named entity 'real-time PCR' named entity 'Sofia' named entity 'Sofia' named entity 'Sofia' named entity 'rapid influenza diagnostic test' named entity 'nasopharyngeal swabs' named entity 'influenza' named entity 'digital readout' named entity 'rapid influenza diagnostic test' named entity 'influenza' named entity 'Results' named entity 'Fluorescence' named entity 'immunoassay' named entity 'antigen' named entity 'RNAs' named entity 'influenza' named entity 'nitrocellulose' named entity 'LAN' named entity 'influenza virus' named entity 'reagent' named entity 'wireless network' named entity 'reagent' named entity 'immunofluorescence' named entity 'influenza virus' named entity 'influenza' named entity 'colorimetric' named entity 'NIBSC' named entity 'nucleoprotein' named entity 'influenza' named entity 'influenza' named entity 'viral antigens'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software