About: Imaging volume trends and recovery during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative analysis between a large urban academic hospital and its affiliated imaging centers

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Imaging volume trends and recovery during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative analysis between a large urban academic hospital and its affiliated imaging centers Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : covidontheweb.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
title	Imaging volume trends and recovery during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative analysis between a large urban academic hospital and its affiliated imaging centers
Creator	Lee, Susanna Lang, Angela Lang, Min Little, Brent Mendoza, Dexter Flores, Efren Som, Avik Lang2, Angela Pianykh, Oleg Saini, Sanjay Succi, Marc Yeung, Tristan
source	Elsevier; Medline; PMC
abstract	RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: While affiliated imaging centers play an important role in healthcare systems, little is known of how their operations are impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Our goal was to investigate imaging volume trends during the pandemic at our large academic hospital compared to the affiliated imaging centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a descriptive retrospective study of imaging volume from an academic hospital (main hospital campus) and its affiliated imaging centers from January 1 through May 21, 2020. Imaging volume assessment was separated into pre-state of emergency (SOE) period (before SOE in Massachusetts on March 10, 2020), “post-SOE” period (time after “non-essential” services closure on March 24, 2020), and “transition” period (between pre-SOE and post-SOE). RESULTS: Imaging volume began to decrease on March 11, 2020, after hospital policy to delay non-essential studies. The average weekly imaging volume during the post-SOE period declined by 54% at the main hospital campus and 64% at the affiliated imaging centers. The rate of imaging volume recovery was slower for affiliated imaging centers (slope = 6.95 for weekdays) compared to main hospital campus (slope = 7.18 for weekdays). CT, radiography, and ultrasound exhibited the lowest volume loss, with weekly volume decrease of 41%, 49%, and 53%, respectively, at the main hospital campus, and 43%, 61%, and 60%, respectively, at affiliated imaging centers. Mammography had the greatest volume loss of 92% at both the main hospital campus and affiliated imaging centers. CONCLUSION: Affiliated imaging center volume decreased to a greater degree than the main hospital campus and showed a slower rate of recovery. Furthermore, the trend in imaging volume and recovery were temporally related to public health announcements and COVID-19 cases.
has issue date	2020-08-15(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1016/j.acra.2020.08.008
bibo:pmid	32830030
has license	no-cc
sha1sum (hex)	59a672e793fabfe4a3c74b7f0372a4b1b9801180
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.08.008
resource representing a document's title	Imaging volume trends and recovery during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative analysis between a large urban academic hospital and its affiliated imaging centers
has PubMed Central identifier	PMC7428785
has PubMed identifier	32830030
schema:publication	Acad Radiol
resource representing a document's body	covid:59a672e793fabfe4a3c74b7f0372a4b1b9801180#body_text
is schema:about of	named entity 'academic hospital' named entity 'COVID-19 pandemic' named entity 'imaging centers' named entity 'academic hospital' named entity 'data warehouse' named entity 'COVID-19' named entity 'healthcare systems' named entity 'COVID-19' named entity 'medical imaging' named entity 'imaging modalities' named entity 'radiography' named entity 'mammography' named entity 'imaging modalities' named entity 'radiology' named entity 'academic hospital' named entity 'nuclear medicine' named entity 'heart failure' named entity 'radiology' named entity 'medical care' named entity 'imaging centers' named entity 'Business Insider' named entity 'New York' named entity 'March 11' named entity 'imaging centers' named entity 'state of emergency' named entity 'resource allocation' named entity 'Boston' named entity 'lung cancer screening' named entity 'Mammography' named entity 'ultrasound' named entity 'state of emergency' named entity 'imaging centers' named entity 'mammography' named entity 'SARS-CoV-2 virus' named entity 'COVID' named entity 'Massachusetts' named entity 'Massachusetts' named entity 'HIPAA' named entity 'healthcare systems' named entity 'COVID-19 pandemic' named entity 'Wuhan' named entity 'COVID-19 pandemic' named entity 'mammography' named entity 'Massachusetts' named entity 'outpatient' named entity 'imaging centers' named entity 'radiologists' named entity 'imaging studies' named entity 'mammography' named entity 'May 21' named entity 'New York' named entity 'imaging centers' named entity 'governmental policies' named entity 'blue line' named entity 'COVID-19' named entity 'computed tomography' named entity 'diagnostic imaging' named entity 'imaging centers' named entity 'Charlie Baker' named entity 'radiography' named entity 'quaternary care' named entity 'nuclear medicine' named entity 'American College of Radiology' named entity 'COVID-19' named entity 'radiology' named entity '95% confidence interval' named entity 'Massachusetts' named entity 'time series analysis' named entity 'imaging centers' named entity 'COVID'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software