About: Intrusion of software robots into journalism: The public's and journalists' perceptions of news written by algorithms and human journalists

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Intrusion of software robots into journalism: The public's and journalists' perceptions of news written by algorithms and human journalists Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : covidontheweb.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
title	Intrusion of software robots into journalism: The public's and journalists' perceptions of news written by algorithms and human journalists
Creator	Im, Hyunsuk Jung, Jaemin Kim, Youngju Oh, Sewook Song, Haeyeop
topic	covid:40a07bdce5fdd3382c1429db8b41cfebe22246be#this
source	Elsevier; Medline; PMC
abstract	Abstract This study adopted a two (author: algorithm or journalist) by two (notification of author: real or inverse) between subject design to investigate how the public and journalists perceive the quality of algorithms-written articles compared with human journalist's work. Findings showed that both the public and journalists' evaluations were varied by the manipulation of author notification. That is, the public gave higher scores to the algorithm's work when it was notified as the real author, but they gave lower scores to the algorithm's work when the author was notified as a journalist. It confirmed the public's negative attitude toward journalists' credibility and craving for new information and communication technology (ICT) products/services in Korea. Based on journalists' resistance to change and innovation and the theory of prejudice, it was expected that journalists would be favorable to another journalist's work and unfavorable to an algorithm's work. However, contrary to the hypothetical expectation, journalists also gave higher scores to an algorithm's work and lower scores to a journalist's work. Implications relating to the intrusion of algorithm-written articles into journalism were discussed.
has issue date	2017-06-30(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.022
bibo:pmid	32288175
has license	els-covid
sha1sum (hex)	40a07bdce5fdd3382c1429db8b41cfebe22246be
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.022
resource representing a document's title	Intrusion of software robots into journalism: The public's and journalists' perceptions of news written by algorithms and human journalists
has PubMed Central identifier	PMC7126872
has PubMed identifier	32288175
schema:publication	Computers in Human Behavior
resource representing a document's body	covid:40a07bdce5fdd3382c1429db8b41cfebe22246be#body_text
is http://vocab.deri.ie/void#inDataset of	proxy:http/ns.inria.fr/covid19/40a07bdce5fdd3382c1429db8b41cfebe22246be
is schema:about of	named entity 'journalists' named entity 'scores' named entity 'journalist' named entity 'journalists' named entity 'ICT' named entity 'HUMAN' named entity 'PERCEPTIONS' named entity 'MANIPULATION' named entity 'PRODUCTS' named entity 'COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY' named entity 'WRITTEN' named entity 'KOREA' named entity 'PREJUDICE' named entity 'INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION' named entity 'ARTICLES' named entity 'PERCEIVE' named entity 'FINDINGS' named entity 'ROBOTS' named entity 'REAL' named entity 'FAVORABLE' named entity 'SUBJECT' named entity 'RESISTANCE TO CHANGE' named entity 'ADOPTED' named entity 'JOURNALISTS' named entity 'NOTIFICATION' named entity 'CONFIRMED' named entity 'INVERSE' named entity 'EXPECTED' named entity 'INTRUSION' named entity 'ALGORITHMS' named entity 'SOFTWARE' named entity 'HYPOTHETICAL' named entity 'UNFAVORABLE' named entity 'BASED' named entity 'STUDY' named entity 'INNOVATION' named entity 'JOURNALISM' named entity 'HOW' named entity 'DESIGN' named entity 'GAVE' named entity 'CREDIBILITY' named entity 'TO INVESTIGATE' named entity 'JOURNALISTS' named entity 'JOURNALISM' named entity 'INTRUSION' named entity '27S' named entity 'PUBLIC' named entity 'WORK' named entity 'AUTHOR' named entity 'THEORY' named entity 'CRAVING' named entity 'PUBLIC' named entity '27S' named entity 'JOURNALIST' named entity 'SCORES' named entity 'NEW INFORMATION' named entity 'COMPARED' named entity 'BUT' named entity 'EXPECTATION' named entity 'ALGORITHM' named entity 'QUALITY' named entity 'EVALUATIONS' named entity 'HUMAN' named entity 'NEGATIVE ATTITUDE' named entity 'LOWER' named entity 'NEWS' named entity 'WRITTEN' named entity 'HIGHER' covid:arg/40a07bdce5fdd3382c1429db8b41cfebe22246be named entity 'higher' named entity 'scores' named entity 'journalist' named entity 'technology' named entity 'journalists' named entity 'expected'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software