About: COVID-19 Initial Impact on Radiology Practices: Survey from ACR/RBMA

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: COVID-19 Initial Impact on Radiology Practices: Survey from ACR/RBMA Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : covidontheweb.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
has title	COVID-19 Initial Impact on Radiology Practices: Survey from ACR/RBMA
Creator	Wu, Xiao Rochester, Minnesota Clinic, Mayo Hughes, Danny Naidich, Jason Sanelli, Pina Zucker, Barbara Mcginty, Geraldine Duszak, Richard Fleishon, Howard Bender, Claire Donald, Facr Iii, Ezequiel Malhotra, Ajay Neiman, Harvey Pashley, Neale Silva, Ezequiel South, M Stengel, Casey Williams, Beth
topic	covid:1ca41df6bf0f69d110a103599439042776c23b03#this
Source	Elsevier; Medline; PMC
abstract	Abstract Objective The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) impacted radiology practices in many ways. We aimed to estimate declines in imaging volumes and financial impact across different practice settings during April 2020. Methods The survey constituting 48 questions was conducted through members of the ACR and the Radiology Business Management Association (RBMA) during May 2020. Survey questions focused on practice demographics, volumes, financials, personnel and staff adjustments, and anticipation of recovery. Results During April 2020, nearly all radiology practices reported substantial (56.4-63.7%) declines in imaging volumes with outpatient imaging volumes most severely affected. Mean gross charges declined 50.1-54.8% and collections declined 46.4-53.9%. Percentage of reductions did not correlate with practice size. Majority of respondents believed that volumes would recover but not entirely (62-88%) and anticipated a short-term recovery, with a surge likely in the short-term due to postponement of elective imaging (52-64%). 15.6% reported that radiologists in their practices tested positive for COVID. Over half (52.3%) reported availability of personal protective equipment had become an issue or was inadequate. A majority (62.3%) reported that their practices had existing remote reading or teleradiology capabilities in place prior to the pandemic, and 22.3% developed such capabilities in response to the pandemic. Conclusions Radiology practices across different settings experienced substantial declines in imaging volumes and collections during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in April 2020. Most are actively engaged in both short- and long-term operational adjustments.
has issue date	2020-08-04(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1016/j.jacr.2020.07.028
bibo:pmid	32853538
has license	els-covid
sha1sum (hex)	1ca41df6bf0f69d110a103599439042776c23b03
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2020.07.028
resource representing a document's title	COVID-19 Initial Impact on Radiology Practices: Survey from ACR/RBMA
has PubMed Central identifier	PMC7402108
has PubMed identifier	32853538
schema:publication	J Am Coll Radiol
resource representing a document's body	covid:1ca41df6bf0f69d110a103599439042776c23b03#body_text
is http://vocab.deri.ie/void#inDataset of	https://covidontheweb.inria.fr:4443/about/id/http/ns.inria.fr/covid19/1ca41df6bf0f69d110a103599439042776c23b03
is schema:about of	named entity 'Mean' named entity 'volumes' named entity 'Methods' named entity 'recovery' named entity 'RBMA' named entity 'pandemic' named entity 'demographics' named entity 'pandemic' named entity 'Statement' covid:arg/1ca41df6bf0f69d110a103599439042776c23b03 named entity 'Business Management' named entity 'substantial' named entity 'volumes' named entity 'imaging' named entity 'volumes' named entity 'imaging' named entity 'outpatient' named entity 'imaging' named entity 'coronavirus disease 2019' named entity 'size' named entity 'teleradiology' named entity 'May 2020' named entity 'April 2020' named entity 'April 2020' named entity 'Radiology' named entity 'volumes' named entity 'radiology' named entity 'imaging centers' named entity 'PPE' named entity 'response rate' named entity 'linear regression' named entity 'statistically significant' named entity 'radiology' named entity 'FTEs' named entity 'COVID-19' named entity 'COVID-19 pandemic' named entity '50%' named entity 'radiology' named entity '2/23' named entity 'COVID-19' named entity 'Radiology' named entity 'imaging centers' named entity 'teleradiology' named entity 'COVID-19 pandemic' named entity 'high-risk' named entity 'PPE' named entity 'missing data' named entity 'FTEs' named entity 'current literature' named entity 'Data points' named entity 'Northern California' named entity 'radiologists' named entity 'Bonferroni' named entity 'radiology' named entity 'response rate' named entity 'outpatient and inpatient' named entity 'outpatient setting' named entity 'systematic bias' named entity '23.5%' named entity 'radiology'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software