About: The need of health policy perspective to protect Healthcare Workers during COVID-19 pandemic. A GRADE rapid review on the N95 respirators effectiveness

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: The need of health policy perspective to protect Healthcare Workers during COVID-19 pandemic. A GRADE rapid review on the N95 respirators effectiveness Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : covidontheweb.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
title	The need of health policy perspective to protect Healthcare Workers during COVID-19 pandemic. A GRADE rapid review on the N95 respirators effectiveness
Creator	Fauci, Alice Coclite, Daniela Gianola, Silvia Iacorossi, Laura Iannone, Primiano Mastroianni, Claudio Napoletano, Antonello Renzi, Cristina D'angelo, Daniela Torre, Giuseppe Castellini Id, Greta
source	Medline; PMC
abstract	Protecting Health Care Workers (HCWs) during routine care of suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients is of paramount importance to halt the SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2) pandemic. The WHO, ECDC and CDC have issued conflicting guidelines on the use of respiratory filters (N95) by HCWs. We searched PubMed, Embase and The Cochrane Library from the inception to March 21, 2020 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing N95 respirators versus surgical masks for prevention of COVID-19 or any other respiratory infection among HCWs. The grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. Four RCTs involving 8736 HCWs were included. We did not find any trial specifically on prevention of COVID-19. However, wearing N95 respirators can prevent 73 more (95% CI 46–91) clinical respiratory infections per 1000 HCWs compared to surgical masks (2 RCTs; 2594 patients; low quality of evidence). A protective effect of N95 respirators in laboratory-confirmed bacterial colonization (RR = 0.41; 95%CI 0.28–0.61) was also found. A trend in favour of N95 respirators was observed in preventing laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infections, laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, and influenza like illness. We found no direct high quality evidence on whether N95 respirators are better than surgical masks for HCWs protection from SARS-CoV-2. However, low quality evidence suggests that N95 respirators protect HCWs from clinical respiratory infections. This finding should be contemplated to decide the best strategy to support the resilience of healthcare systems facing the potentially catastrophic SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
has issue date	2020-06-03(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1371/journal.pone.0234025
bibo:pmid	32492045
has license	cc-by
sha1sum (hex)	076cc83de697c45d678169df21a26654b1a68cbe
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234025
resource representing a document's title	The need of health policy perspective to protect Healthcare Workers during COVID-19 pandemic. A GRADE rapid review on the N95 respirators effectiveness
has PubMed Central identifier	PMC7269249
has PubMed identifier	32492045
schema:publication	PLoS One
resource representing a document's body	covid:076cc83de697c45d678169df21a26654b1a68cbe#body_text
is schema:about of	named entity 'surgical masks' named entity 'illness' named entity 'However' named entity 'patients' named entity 'health policy' named entity 'LABORATORY' named entity 'EVIDENCE' named entity 'QUALITY OF EVIDENCE' named entity 'SEARCHED' named entity 'N95' named entity 'RCTs' named entity 'decide' named entity 'N95' named entity 'evidence' named entity 'Embase' named entity 'SARS-CoV-2' named entity 'N95' named entity 'RCTs' named entity 'This' named entity 'healthcare systems' named entity 'N95' named entity 'respiratory infection' named entity 'strategy' named entity 'RCTs' named entity 'preventing' named entity 'Cochrane Library' named entity 'N95' named entity 'CDC' named entity 'randomized controlled trials' named entity 'bacterial colonization' named entity 'SARS-CoV-2' named entity 'respiratory infection' named entity 'health policy' named entity 'GRADE' named entity 'randomized controlled trials' named entity 'route of transmission' named entity 'respiratory infection' named entity 'randomized controlled trials' named entity 'RCTs' named entity 'surgical masks' named entity 'HCW' named entity 'N95' named entity 'descriptive statistics' named entity 'statistical significance' named entity 'U.S.' named entity 'influenza' named entity 'N95' named entity 'ECDC' named entity 'cough' named entity 'N95' named entity 'N95' named entity 'randomized trial' named entity 'aerosols' named entity 'N95' named entity 'SARS-CoV-2' named entity 'square root' named entity 'meta-analysis' named entity 'worst case scenario' named entity 'SARS-CoV-2' named entity 'medical masks' named entity 'airborne particles' named entity 'GRADE approach' named entity 'N95' named entity 'surgical masks' named entity 'standard error' named entity 'face masks' named entity 'in-patients' named entity 'COVID-19 pandemic' named entity 'mortality rate' named entity 'aerosol' named entity 'aerosol'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software