About: Argumentation, Eureka and emotion: An analysis of group projects in creative design training

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Argumentation, Eureka and emotion: An analysis of group projects in creative design training Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : covidontheweb.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
has title	Argumentation, Eureka and emotion: An analysis of group projects in creative design training
Creator	Baker, Michael Corvin, Tim Détienne, Françoise Mougenot, Céline Pennington, Miles
topic	covid:f386c67a28d630f1748d94cc4dfa2fc5c011864a#this
Source	Elsevier; Medline; PMC
abstract	Creativity training has been generally based on avoiding critique during idea generation, although benefits of argumentation have been shown during idea selection and elaboration. The research reported here aims to understand how argumentative interactions involving role-play, with subsequent group reflection on them, contribute to collaborative creative design projects. The study was carried within a specialised Masters course at the Royal College of Art (London), organised jointly with Imperial College London, and focuses on analysing group reflection sessions of two groups of students whose on-going project was initially defined as “communication by touch”. Results showed that although students reported difficulties in playing argumentative roles that were not aligned with their personal views, their debates enabled them to arrive at “Eureka!” moments with respect to better grounded and precise definitions of their project concepts. We highlight the complex ways in which emotions circulate with respect to “Eureka!” moments, role-play and grounding. Given differences in ways that groups played out their assigned argumentative roles, we conclude that role play debate and group reflection on it need to be applied and considered as a whole in creative design training.
has issue date	2020-07-24(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100436
bibo:pmid	32834928
has license	no-cc
sha1sum (hex)	f386c67a28d630f1748d94cc4dfa2fc5c011864a
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100436
resource representing a document's title	Argumentation, Eureka and emotion: An analysis of group projects in creative design training
has PubMed Central identifier	PMC7378484
has PubMed identifier	32834928
schema:publication	Learn Cult Soc Interact
resource representing a document's body	covid:f386c67a28d630f1748d94cc4dfa2fc5c011864a#body_text
is http://vocab.deri.ie/void#inDataset of	https://covidontheweb.inria.fr:4443/about/id/http/ns.inria.fr/covid19/f386c67a28d630f1748d94cc4dfa2fc5c011864a
is schema:about of	named entity 'emotion' named entity 'brainstorming' named entity 'project definition' named entity 'aesthetics' named entity 'emotion' named entity 'collaborative learning' named entity 'Olbrechts-Tyteca' named entity 'PROJ' named entity 'microsocial' named entity 'argument clinic' named entity 'technological devices' named entity 'PROJ' named entity 'Alban Berg' named entity 'argumentative role' named entity 'production blocking' named entity 'argumentative role' named entity 'project definition' named entity 'PROJ' named entity 'Einstein' named entity 'Sartre' named entity 'Telecom Paris' named entity 'emotional experience' named entity 'The Beatles' named entity 'loosely coupled' named entity 'PROJ' named entity 'Royal College of Art' named entity 'argumentation' named entity 'empirical studies' named entity 'DNA double helix' named entity 'argumentation' named entity 'project definition' named entity 'project definition' named entity 'project definition' named entity 'social loafing' named entity 'design studio' named entity 'Argument Clinic' named entity 'PROJ' named entity 'de Beauvoir' named entity 'PROJ' named entity 'idea generation' named entity 'Vygotsky' named entity 'positive affect' named entity 'Argument Clinic' named entity 'video recording' named entity 'research literature' named entity 'project definition' named entity 'argument clinic' named entity 'kinect' named entity 'Argument Clinic' named entity 'creative design' named entity 'qualitative analysis' named entity 'autism' named entity 'Détienne' named entity 'sonar' named entity 'brainstorming' named entity 'smiles' named entity 'pedagogical design' named entity 'electronic device' named entity 'RCA' named entity 'Paris, France' named entity 'socio-cognitive' named entity 'argumentative role' named entity 'project definition' named entity 'emotion' named entity 'argumentation' named entity 'proprioception' named entity 'argumentative role' named entity 'Détienne' named entity 'project definition' named entity 'project definition' named entity 'video recorded' named entity 'creative design' named entity 'PROJ' named entity 'Pierre Curie' named entity 'Tokyo Institute of Technology'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software