Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
owl:sameAs
Inference Rule:
b3s
b3sifp
dbprdf-label
facets
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#
http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#
http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#
http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
ldp
oplweb
skos-trans
virtrdf-label
None
About:
Clinical Performance of SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Tests
Goto
Sponge
NotDistinct
Permalink
An Entity of Type :
schema:ScholarlyArticle
, within Data Space :
covidontheweb.inria.fr
associated with source
document(s)
Type:
Academic Article
research paper
schema:ScholarlyArticle
New Facet based on Instances of this Class
Attributes
Values
type
Academic Article
research paper
schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy
Covid-on-the-Web dataset
has title
Clinical Performance of SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Tests
Creator
Whittier, Susan
Sobieszczyk, Magdalena
Westblade, Lars
Green, Daniel
Boehme, Amelia
Cushing, Melissa
Liu, Dakai
Rennert, Hanna
Sepulveda, Jorge
Zucker, Jason
Craney, Arryn
Velu, Priya
Source
Medline; PMC
abstract
Molecular testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the gold standard for diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but the clinical performance of these tests is still poorly understood, particularly with regard to disease course, patient-specific factors, and viral shedding. From 10 March to 1 May 2020, NewYork-Presbyterian laboratories performed 27,377 SARS-CoV-2 molecular assays from 22,338 patients. Repeat testing was performed for 3,432 patients, of which 2,413 had initial negative and 802 had initial positive results. Repeat-tested patients were more likely to have severe disease and low viral loads. The negative predictive value of the first-day result among repeat-tested patients was 81.3% The clinical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 molecular assays was estimated between 58% and 96%, depending on the unknown number of false-negative results in single-tested patients. Conversion to negative was unlikely to occur before 15 to 20 days after initial testing or 20 to 30 days after the onset of symptoms, with 50% conversion occurring at 28 days after initial testing. Conversion from first-day negative to positive results increased linearly with each day of testing, reaching 25% probability in 20 days. Sixty patients fluctuated between positive and negative results over several weeks, suggesting that caution is needed when single-test results are acted upon. In summary, our study provides estimates of the clinical performance of SARS-CoV-2 molecular assays and suggests time frames for appropriate repeat testing, namely, 15 to 20 days after a positive test and the same day or next 2 days after a negative test for patients with high suspicion for COVID-19.
has issue date
2020-07-23
(
xsd:dateTime
)
bibo:doi
10.1128/jcm.00995-20
bibo:pmid
32513858
has license
no-cc
sha1sum (hex)
dea45ea0405500fa6e17dc224de20def4b10cf60
schema:url
https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00995-20
resource representing a document's title
Clinical Performance of SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Tests
has PubMed Central identifier
PMC7383556
has PubMed identifier
32513858
schema:publication
J Clin Microbiol
resource representing a document's body
covid:dea45ea0405500fa6e17dc224de20def4b10cf60#body_text
is
schema:about
of
named entity 'onset'
named entity 'day'
named entity 'patients'
named entity 'high'
named entity 'false-negative'
named entity 'regard'
named entity 'suspicion'
named entity 'positive'
named entity 'SUMMARY'
named entity 'POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE'
named entity 'TEST'
covid:arg/dea45ea0405500fa6e17dc224de20def4b10cf60
named entity 'March'
named entity 'negative'
named entity 'initial'
named entity 'coronavirus disease 2019'
named entity 'The'
named entity 'assays'
named entity 'needed'
named entity 'loads'
named entity 'gold standard'
named entity 'negative'
named entity 'initial'
named entity 'gold standard'
named entity 'coronavirus disease 2019'
named entity 'SARS-CoV-2'
named entity 'SARS-CoV-2'
named entity 'asymptomatic'
named entity 'RNA'
named entity 'negative result'
named entity 'emergency department'
named entity '8 days'
named entity 'SARS-CoV-2'
named entity 'infection'
named entity 'SARS-CoV-2'
named entity 'SARS-CoV-2'
named entity 'negative result'
named entity 'internal control'
named entity 'Latino'
named entity 'Caucasian race'
named entity 'positive test'
named entity 'clinical characteristics'
named entity 'COVID-19'
named entity 'intensive care unit'
named entity 'false negatives'
named entity 'viral load'
named entity 'observational study'
named entity 'PCR'
named entity 'viscosity'
named entity '28 days'
named entity 'cumulative probability'
named entity 'electronic medical record'
named entity 'infection'
named entity 'SARS-CoV-2'
named entity 'RT-PCR'
named entity 'Kaplan-Meier estimator'
named entity 'SARS-CoV-2'
named entity 'nosocomially'
named entity 'SARS-CoV-2'
named entity 'infection'
named entity 'SARS-CoV-2'
named entity 'sampling bias'
named entity '10.5'
named entity 'infection'
named entity 'SARS-CoV-2'
named entity 'initial testing'
named entity 'New York City'
named entity 'selection bias'
named entity 'COVID-19 test'
named entity 'COVID-19'
◂◂ First
◂ Prev
Next ▸
Last ▸▸
Page 1 of 5
Go
Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020
Alternative Linked Data Documents:
Sponger
|
ODE
Content Formats:
RDF
ODATA
Microdata
About
OpenLink Virtuoso
version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software