About: Comparison of visual and electronic devices for individual identification of dromedary camels under different farming conditions

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Comparison of visual and electronic devices for individual identification of dromedary camels under different farming conditions Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : covidontheweb.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
has title	Comparison of visual and electronic devices for individual identification of dromedary camels under different farming conditions
Creator	Aljumaah, §# Alshaikh, M Amann, ║ Ayadi, M Cabrera, S Caja, G Díaz-Medina, E El-Metwaly, H El-Shafie, M Hammadi, ║ Khorchani, ║ Salama, A Salama, O Seddik, ║ Yahyahoui, M
Source	Medline; PMC
abstract	The camel industry uses traditional (i.e., iron brands and ear tags) and modern (i.e., microchips) identification (ID) systems without having performance results of reference. Previously iron-branded (n = 45; 1 yr) and microchipped (n = 59; 7 yr) camels showed problems of healing (8.6% of brands) and reading (only 42.9% of brands and 69.5% of microchips were readable), which made their use inadvisable. With the aim of proposing suitable ID systems for different farming conditions, an on-field study was performed using a total of 528 dromedaries at 4 different locations (Egypt, n = 83; Spain, n = 304; Saudi Arabia, n = 90; and Tunisia, n = 51). The ID devices tested were visual (button ear tags, 28.5 mm diameter, n = 178; double flag ear tags, 50 by 15 mm, n = 83; both made of polyurethane) and electronic (ear tags, n = 90, and rumen boluses, n = 555). Electronic ear tags were polyurethane-loop type (75 by 9 mm) with a container in which a 22-mm transponder of full-duplex technology was lodged. Electronic boluses of 7 types, varying in dimensions (50 to 76 mm length, 11 to 21 mm width, and 12.7 to 82.1 g weight) and specific gravity (SG; 1.49 to 3.86) and each of them containing a 31-mm transponder of half-duplex technology, were all administered to the dromedaries at the beginning of the study. When a low-SG bolus was lost, a high-SG bolus was readministered. Readability rates of each ID system were evaluated during 1 to 3 yr, according to device and location, and yearly values were estimated for comparison. On a yearly basis, visual ear tag readability was not fully satisfactory; it was lower for rectangular ear tags (66.3%) than for button ear tags (80.9%). Yearly readability of electronic ear tags was 93.7%. Bolus readability dramatically varied according to their SG; the SG < 2.0 boluses were fully lost after 8 mo. In contrast, the SG > 3.0 boluses were efficiently retained (99.6 to 100%) at all locations. In conclusion, according to the expected long lifespan of camels, low ID performances were observed for iron brands, injectable microchips, and ear tags (visual and electronic), making their use inadvisable as unique ID systems in camels. The high readability of dense electronic boluses recommended their use as a permanent ID device of reference in camels.
has issue date	2016-08-01(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.2527/jas.2016-0472
bibo:pmid	27695805
has license	no-cc
sha1sum (hex)	88226fee6bc4b5afa67732a4597c9aa23a641cbc
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016-0472
resource representing a document's title	Comparison of visual and electronic devices for individual identification of dromedary camels under different farming conditions
has PubMed Central identifier	PMC7199663
has PubMed identifier	27695805
schema:publication	J Anim Sci
resource representing a document's body	covid:88226fee6bc4b5afa67732a4597c9aa23a641cbc#body_text
is schema:about of	named entity 'boluses' named entity 'dimensions' named entity 'Tunisia' named entity 'Electronic' named entity 'ear' named entity 'dromedaries' named entity 'ear' named entity 'Electronic' named entity 'camels' named entity 'farming' named entity 'SPECIFIC GRAVITY' named entity 'DIAMETER' named entity 'EXPECTED' named entity 'LIFESPAN' named entity 'POLYURETHANE' named entity 'AIM' named entity 'TRANSPONDER' named entity 'DUPLEX' named entity 'READING' named entity '288' named entity 'INDIVIDUAL IDENTIFICATION' named entity 'ELECTRONIC' named entity 'tested' named entity 'flag' named entity 'iron' named entity 'ear' named entity 'brands' named entity 'high' named entity 'device' named entity 'boluses' named entity 'readable' named entity 'making' named entity 'diameter' named entity 'microchipped' named entity 'ear tag' named entity 'performances' named entity 'full-duplex' named entity 'readability' named entity 'Yearly' named entity 'systems' named entity 'problems' named entity 'electronic' named entity 'electronic' named entity 'basis' named entity 'iron' named entity 'visual' named entity '2.0' named entity 'polyurethane' named entity 'rumen' named entity 'full-duplex' named entity 'Egypt' named entity 'full-duplex' named entity 'feral' named entity 'forestomach' named entity 'rangeland' named entity 'Saudi Arabia' named entity 'cattle' named entity '3.5' named entity 'lactation' named entity 'RFID' named entity 'nontoxic' named entity 'Almelo' named entity 'animal welfare' named entity '1.1' named entity 'reading time' named entity 'half-duplex' named entity 'flat rate'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software