About: Comparison of Different Tests to Diagnose Feline Infectious Peritonitis

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Comparison of Different Tests to Diagnose Feline Infectious Peritonitis Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : covidontheweb.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
has title	Comparison of Different Tests to Diagnose Feline Infectious Peritonitis
Creator	Lutz, Hans Reinacher, Manfred Hartmann, Katrin Egberink, Herman Hirschberger, Johannes Binder, Christina Cole, Dana Frost, Jens Hermanns, Walter Schroo, Simone
topic	covid:13a4001b232c5ebb12820ebf7a2beca29f2c52b6#this
Source	Medline; PMC
abstract	Clinical data from 488 cats (1979–2000) with histopathologically confirmed feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) and 620 comparable controls were evaluated retrospectively to assess the value of several diagnostic tests frequently used in the evaluation of cats with suspected FIP. Diagnostic utility of serum albumin to globulin ratio for the diagnosis of FIP was greater than of the utility of serum total protein and ‐/‐globulin concentrations. Diagnostic utility of these variables was higher when performed on effusion. On effusion, positive and negative predictive values of Rivalta's test, a test that distinguishes between exudates and transudates (0.86 and 0.97), anti‐coronavirus antibody detection (0.90 and 0.79), and immunofluorescence staining of coronavirus antigen in macrophages (1.00 and 0.57) were investigated. The positive and negative predictive values of presence of anti‐coronavirus antibodies were 0.44 and 0.90, respectively, antibody concentrations (1:1,600) were 0.94 and 0.88, presence of immune complexes measured by a competitive enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay were 0.67 and 0.84, and detection of viral RNA by serum reverse‐transcrip‐tase polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) were 0.90 and 0.47. Effusion RT‐PCR was performed in 6 cats; it was positive in all 5 cats with FIP and negative in the cat with another disease. Diagnostic assays on the fluid in cats with body effusion had good predictive values. Definitive diagnosis of FIP on the basis of measurement of various variables in serum was not possible. Serum tests can only be used to facilitate the decision for more invasive diagnostic methods.
has issue date	2008-06-28(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1111/j.1939-1676.2003.tb02515.x
bibo:pmid	14658713
has license	no-cc
sha1sum (hex)	13a4001b232c5ebb12820ebf7a2beca29f2c52b6
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2003.tb02515.x
resource representing a document's title	Comparison of Different Tests to Diagnose Feline Infectious Peritonitis
has PubMed Central identifier	PMC7197515
has PubMed identifier	14658713
schema:publication	J Vet Intern Med
resource representing a document's body	covid:13a4001b232c5ebb12820ebf7a2beca29f2c52b6#body_text
is http://vocab.deri.ie/void#inDataset of	proxy:http/ns.inria.fr/covid19/13a4001b232c5ebb12820ebf7a2beca29f2c52b6
is schema:about of	named entity 'utility' named entity 'antigen' named entity 'staining' named entity 'polymerase' named entity 'diagnosis' named entity 'File' named entity 'Feline' named entity 'Peritonitis' named entity 'EVALUATION' named entity 'POSSIBLE' named entity 'DECISION' named entity 'MEASURED' named entity 'USED' named entity '90%' named entity 'VARIOUS' named entity 'GREATER THAN' named entity 'HIGHER' named entity 'measurement' named entity 'RNA' named entity 'positive' named entity 'FIP' named entity 'FIP' named entity 'antibody' named entity 'greater' named entity 'measured' named entity 'immunofluorescence' named entity 'FIP' named entity 'transudates' named entity 'FIP' named entity 'competitive' named entity 'Diagnostic' named entity 'cats' named entity 'diagnostic tests' named entity 'antibody' named entity 'polymerase chain reaction' named entity 'FIP' named entity 'exudates and transudates' named entity 'FIP' named entity 'coronavirus' named entity 'serum total protein' named entity 'FIP' named entity 'basis' named entity 'coronavirus' named entity 'globulin' named entity 'serum albumin' named entity 'serum' named entity 'Diagnostic assays' named entity 'diagnostic tests' named entity 'FIP' named entity 'macrophages' named entity 'staining' named entity 'FIP' named entity 'serum' named entity 'diagnostic methods' named entity 'antigen' named entity 'chain reaction' named entity 'variables' named entity 'RT-PCR' named entity 'antibody' named entity 'viral RNA' named entity 'SUSPECTED' named entity 'feline infectious peritonitis' named entity 'RT-PCR' named entity 'Effusion' named entity 'histopathologically' named entity 'immune complexes' named entity 'CONTROLS' named entity 'CONFIRMED' named entity 'SERUM ALBUMIN' named entity 'CAT'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software