About: Comparative Study of Microbiological Monitoring Results from Three Types of Sampling Methods after Gastrointestinal Endoscope Reprocessing

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Comparative Study of Microbiological Monitoring Results from Three Types of Sampling Methods after Gastrointestinal Endoscope Reprocessing Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ScholarlyArticle, within Data Space : covidontheweb.inria.fr associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
type	Academic Article research paper schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy	Covid-on-the-Web dataset
has title	Comparative Study of Microbiological Monitoring Results from Three Types of Sampling Methods after Gastrointestinal Endoscope Reprocessing
Creator	Chen, Taiyao Ding, Wenxia Feng, Lili Gao, Xian Jiang, Ziyi Li, Zhaoshen Long, Xisha Ma, Su Xi, Huijun Zhang, Hongzhi Zhang, Lingjuan Zhuang, Shaonan Liu, Yatao
Source	Medline; PMC
abstract	OBJECTIVE: Compare the effects of three sampling methods on the microbiological monitoring results after reprocessing of gastrointestinal endoscopes, providing scientific basis for improving the monitoring quality of gastrointestinal endoscope cleaning and disinfection. METHOD: Gastrointestinal endoscopes after reprocessing were selected randomly at the gastrointestinal endoscopy center of a tertiary hospital in Shanghai from October 2018 to February 2019. The endoscopes selected were all sampled in three different methods under continuous sampling and intermittent sampling respectively. Methods used includes, the biopsy channel group (Group A), the entire channel group (Group B), and the disc brush group (Group C). Then the colony forming units (CFU/piece) were counted in the laboratory. RESULTS: A total of 12 endoscopes were sampled by using continuous sampling approach, in which the detection rate of bacteria in disc brush group (33.3%) and entire channel group (33.3%) was higher than biopsy channel group (8.3%). Among the 12 endoscopes sampled with intermittent approach, the detection rate of bacteria from high to low was the disc brush group (50%), the entire channel group (41.7%), and the biopsy channel group (8.3%). CONCLUSION: Different sampling methods will lead to the difference of microbiological culture results after reprocessing of gastrointestinal endoscope, indicating that the improved sampling method is beneficial to objectively reflect the endoscope cleaning and disinfection effect, and improve the monitoring quality of endoscope disinfection.
has issue date	2019-12-03(xsd:dateTime)
bibo:doi	10.1155/2019/7940468
bibo:pmid	31886251
has license	cc-by
sha1sum (hex)	0ca5279816f66f7fd8c0bdb09d15f5953e019b68
schema:url	https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7940468
resource representing a document's title	Comparative Study of Microbiological Monitoring Results from Three Types of Sampling Methods after Gastrointestinal Endoscope Reprocessing
has PubMed Central identifier	PMC6914964
has PubMed identifier	31886251
schema:publication	Biomed Res Int
resource representing a document's body	covid:0ca5279816f66f7fd8c0bdb09d15f5953e019b68#body_text
is schema:about of	named entity 'Results' named entity 'beneficial' named entity 'biopsy' named entity 'CFU' named entity 'continuous' named entity 'sampled' named entity 'brush' named entity 'brush' named entity 'bacteria' named entity 'detection' named entity 'Types' named entity 'Microbiological' named entity 'MICROBIOLOGICAL' covid:arg/0ca5279816f66f7fd8c0bdb09d15f5953e019b68 named entity 'HIGH' named entity '2018' named entity 'USING' named entity 'INCLUDES' named entity 'LEAD' named entity 'REFLECT' named entity 'RATE' named entity 'OCTOBER' named entity 'ENDOSCOPE' named entity 'GROUP' named entity 'CONTINUOUS SAMPLING' named entity 'PROVIDING' named entity 'TERTIARY' named entity 'BIOPSY' named entity 'SAMPLING METHOD' named entity 'MICROBIOLOGICAL CULTURE' named entity 'DETECTION' named entity 'DIFFERENT' named entity 'METHODS' named entity '2019' named entity 'GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPE' named entity 'OBJECTIVE' named entity '288' named entity 'LABORATORY' named entity 'EFFECT' named entity 'DIFFERENCE' named entity 'CHANNEL GROUP' named entity 'INDICATING' named entity 'BASIS' named entity 'CLEANING AND DISINFECTION' named entity 'METHODS' named entity 'SAMPLING' named entity 'CENTER' named entity 'ENDOSCOPES' named entity 'CONCLUSION' named entity 'TOTAL' named entity 'HOSPITAL' named entity 'HIGHER' named entity 'SAMPLING' named entity 'MONITORING' named entity 'COMPARATIVE STUDY' named entity 'GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPE' named entity 'RESULTS' named entity 'TYPES' named entity 'USED' named entity 'QUALITY' named entity 'ENTIRE' named entity 'DISINFECTION' named entity 'IMPROVED' named entity 'LOW' named entity 'IMPROVING' named entity 'DISC' named entity 'SELECTED' named entity 'APPROACH' named entity 'COMPARE'

Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020

Alternative Linked Data Documents: Sponger | ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software